Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36696564›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023

Transferability of the Electrostatic Parameters of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.

Shiji Zhao, Piotr Cieplak, Yong Duan, Ray Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  9. Streamlining and Optimizing Strategies of Electrostatic Parameterization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  10. Optimal Scheme to Achieve Energy Conservation in Induced Dipole Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiji ZhaoDepartments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4514-0897
Piotr CieplakSBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0700-5691
Yong DuanUC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-5099
Ray LuoDepartments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-8271

Funding

AMBER force field consortium: a coherent biomolecular simulation platformR01GM079383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CIEPLAK, PIOTR, DUAN, YONG · 2007 to 2017
$4.7M
Multi-scaled Modeling of Electrostatic and Polarization Effects in BiomoleculesR35GM130367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI RAY LUO · 2019 to 2026
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079383NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy and transferability are the two highly desirable properties of molecular mechanical force fields. Compared with the extensively used point-charge additive force fields that apply fixed atom-centered point partial charges to model electrostatic interactions, polarizable force fields are thought to have the advantage of modeling the atomic polarization effects. Previous works have demonstrated the accuracy of the recently developed polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) models. In this work, we assessed the transferability of the electrostatic parameters of the pGM models with (pGM-perm) and without (pGM-ind) atomic permanent dipoles in terms of reproducing the electrostatic potentials surrounding molecules/oligomers absent from electrostatic parameterizations. Encouragingly, both the pGM-perm and pGM-ind models show significantly improved transferability than the additive model in the tests (1) from water monomer to water oligomer clusters; (2) across different conformations of amino acid dipeptides and tetrapeptides; (3) from amino acid tetrapeptides to longer polypeptides; and (4) from nucleobase monomers to Watson-Crick base pair dimers and tetramers. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the double-conformation fittings using amino acid tetrapeptides in the αR and β conformations can result in good transferability not only across different tetrapeptide conformations but also from tetrapeptides to polypeptides with lengths ranging from 1 to 20 repetitive residues for both the pGM-ind and pGM-perm models. In addition, the observation that the pGM-ind model has significantly better accuracy and transferability than the point-charge additive model, even though they have an identical number of parameters, strongly suggest the importance of intramolecular polarization effects. In summary, this and previous works together show that the pGM models possess both accuracy and transferability, which are expected to serve as foundations for the development of next-generation polarizable force fields for modeling various polarization-sensitive biological systems and processes.

Indexed as

PeptidesWaterAmino AcidsModels, MolecularStatic ElectricityAmino AcidsPeptidesWater

Identifiers

PMID36696564
PMCPMC10152989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.