ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2023
Development and validation of the Japanese version of EPDS-P for indirect screening of paternal perinatal depression based on maternal reporting: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal observational study.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indirect screening for paternal perinatal depression independent of maternal factors using mother-reported EPDS-partner in a community-based cohort in Japan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of depression at 6 and 12 months postpartum by examining depressive symptoms and self-harm ideation during the early postpartum period: Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the Japanese version of EPDS-P for indirect screening of paternal perinatal depression based on maternal reporting: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal observational study.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe main purpose of this study is to develop an indirect screening system for paternal perinatal depression based on the female partner's assessment in the Japanese population. The Japanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-Partner (EPDS-P) will be used as the indirect screening tool, and its accuracy will be studied in this longitudinal prospective observational study.
methodsPublic health nurses and midwives at the participating community health center are currently inviting couples to participate, and are distributing self-rating scales to the participants. The primary evaluation scales being used in this study are the Japanese versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Japanese version of the EPDS-P which evaluates paternal perinatal depression by women. We will evaluate EPDS-P performance against CES-D, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and correlations. RESULTS AND
conclusionsPerinatal depression is a mental illness that occurs between pregnancy and postpartum within the 12 months, and it is known to increase the risk of adversely impacting on child development. Men may also experience a psychosocial crisis during their partners' perinatal period. Although it was recently reported that the EPDS-P can indirectly detect paternal perinatal depression, there is, as yet, insufficient evidence of this because the previous studies had relatively small sample sizes and were limited to cross-sectional studies in the postpartum period. The development of a screening system for paternal perinatal depression using the EPDS-P will lead to increased awareness of the disease and provide an opportunity to establish a family-based support system in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.