ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2023
Pumping up the volume.
Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Close-up of vesicular ER exit sites by volume electron imaging using FIB-SEM.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The time and cost of annotating ground-truth images and network training are major challenges to utilizing machine learning to automate the mining of volume electron microscopy data. In this issue, Gallusser et al. (2023. J. Cell Biol.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202208005) present a less computationally intense pipeline to detect a single type of organelle using a limited number of loosely annotated images.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.