Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36695894›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2023

[Current evidence for various inpatient psychotherapy programs in the treatment of psychoses-A narrative review article].

Stephanie Mehl, Klaus Hesse, Steffen Moritz, Daniel R Müller, Tilo Kircher, Andreas Bechdolf

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie MehlUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039, Marburg, Deutschland. stephanie.mehl@med.uni-marburg.de.
Klaus HesseUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Steffen MoritzKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Daniel R MüllerUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
Tilo KircherUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039, Marburg, Deutschland.
Andreas BechdolfKliniken für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban und Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Deutschland.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEKlinikum im Friedrichshain · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analysis of the efficacy of evidence-based psychotherapy for patients with psychotic disorders has mostly been carried out in the outpatient field. In the inpatient field the efficacy is sometimes difficult to assess due to different healthcare systems.

objectiveThe aim of this narrative review is to summarize international guidelines and meta-analyses on the efficacy of inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment strategies for patients with psychotic disorders. Based on this, recommendations for disorder-specific ward concepts for acute and postacute fields are formulated.

methodsThe German S3 guidelines, international guidelines, current meta-analyses and primary studies on psychological interventions in the treatment of psychotic disorders were included. Based on the results, recommendations for the inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment in various phases of treatment were formulated (acute phase and postacute phase).

resultsIn the acute phase a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBTp) in the individual setting and family interventions in the group setting as well as metacognitive training (MCT acute) is effective and recommended. In the postacute phase, in addition to individual and group CBTp and family interventions, psychoeducation, social skills training and cognitive remediation have been shown to be effective and are recommended. DISCUSSION: The suggested recommendations for concrete interventions in various treatment phases and the evidence base are critically discussed and recommendations for the structure of wards are presented.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersGuidelines as TopicHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapyAcute wardCognitive behavioral therapyCognitive remediationFamily interventionsMetacognitive training

Identifiers

PMID36695894
OpenAlexW4317936731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.