Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36695460›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2022

A framework for measuring timeliness in the outbreak response path: lessons learned from the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, September 2012 to January 2019.

Carolina Dos S Ribeiro, Martine van Roode, Elmoubasher Farag, Mohamed Nour, Aya Moustafa, Minahil Ahmed, George Haringhuizen, Marion Koopmans, Linda van de Burgwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Editorial: Zoonotic emerging viral infectious diseases.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolina Dos S RibeiroVrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martine van RoodeErasmus Medical Center (EMC), Viroscience Department, Pandemic and Disaster Preparedness Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elmoubasher FaragMinistry of Public Health, Department of Public health, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed NourMinistry of Public Health, Department of Public health, Doha, Qatar.
Aya MoustafaMinistry of Public Health, Department of Public health, Doha, Qatar.
Minahil AhmedMinistry of Public Health, Department of Public health, Doha, Qatar.
George HaringhuizenThe Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Center for Infectious Disease Control, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Marion KoopmansErasmus Medical Center (EMC), Viroscience Department, Pandemic and Disaster Preparedness Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Linda van de BurgwalVrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundEpidemics are a constant threat in the 21st century, particularly disease outbreaks following spillover of an animal virus to humans. Timeliness, a key metric in epidemic response, can be examined to identify critical steps and delays in public health action.AimTo examine timeliness, we analysed the response to the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) epidemic, with a focus on the international and One Health response efforts.MethodsWe performed a historical review of the MERS epidemic between September 2012 and January 2019 in three steps: (i) the construction of a timeline identifying critical events in the global response, (ii) the performance of a critical path analysis to define outbreak milestones and (iii) a time gap analysis to measure timeliness in the execution of these milestones.ResultsWe proposed 14 MERS-specific milestones at different phases of the epidemic, assessing timeliness of the public health response as well as at the animal-human interface, where we identified the most significant delays.ConclusionsWhen comparing timeliness across three coronavirus epidemics, i.e. MERS (2012), SARS (2002) and COVID-19 (2019), we identified clear improvements over time for certain milestones including laboratory confirmation and diagnostics development, while this was not as apparent for others, as the identification of zoonotic hosts. To more efficiently respond to emerging threats, the global health community should widely assess and tackle specific delays in implementing response interventions by addressing challenges in the sharing of information, data and resources, as well as efficiency, quality, transparency and reliability of reporting events.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansPublic HealthReproducibility of Resultsdata sharingglobal healthInfectious diseaseOne Healthoutbreakszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID36695460
PMCPMC9716647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.