Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36695252›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society

Lung cancer in Asian Indian females: Identification of disease-specific characteristics and outcome measures over a 12-year period.

Hariharan Iyer, Tamoghna Ghosh, Avneet Garg, Harsh Agarwal, Deepali Jain, Rambha Pandey, Ashu Seith Bhalla, Rakesh Kumar, Vishal Vashistha, Pawan Tiwari and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hariharan IyerDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tamoghna GhoshDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Avneet GargDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Harsh AgarwalDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepali JainDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rambha PandeyDepartment of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashu Seith BhallaDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishal VashisthaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; Raymond G. Murphy New Mexico Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Section of Hematology and Oncology, 1501 San Pedro Dr SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA.
Pawan TiwariDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saurabh MittalDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vijay HaddaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Karan MadanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Randeep GuleriaDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anant MohanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Globally, the incidence of lung cancer amongst women appears to be increasing. We aimed to compare the socio-epidemiological and clinical characteristics of lung cancer amongst men and women from a large cohort at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Methods: Records of patients diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2008 and March 2020 were reviewed. Baseline epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, histologic profiles, treatment administered, and survival were compared between males and females. Results: A total of 2054 male and 438 female patients were included in analysis. Compared to males, female patients were younger [median age, 56 vs. 60 years, P < 0.001)], less likely to be working, less educated beyond secondary level and less likely to be smokers (29.1% vs. 84.9%, P < 0.0001). No difference in baseline performance status was observed. Females were more frequently diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (54.2% vs. 30.2%, P = <0.0001), stage IV disease (70.8% vs. 63%, P = 0.001), and had higher rate of EGFR mutation (37.2% vs. 21.5%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the proportion of females receiving cancer-specific therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed higher progression-free survival [median 9.17 vs. 7.23 months; P = 0.007] and overall survival [median 13.80 vs. 9.10 months respectively, P = 0.001] amongst females compared to males. Conclusion: Amongst a large cohort of lung cancer, females demonstrated several distinct and characteristic demographics as well as disease-related features, especially better survival outcomes.

Indexed as

FemaleIndialung cancer

Identifiers

PMID36695252
PMCPMC9894289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.