Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36695238›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery

A propensity score matching investigation of short-term results of single-incision laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection via ileostomy site.

Jianxiong Lai, Pengcheng Ye, Junsong Yang, Yanchao Feng, Kai Qiu, Shoujiang Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianxiong LaiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province; Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan Province, China.
Pengcheng YeDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Junsong YangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Yanchao FengDepartment of General Surgery, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, Sichuan Province, China.
Kai QiuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Shoujiang WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The study was performed to verify the results of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) through the ileostomy site for low rectal cancer compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Materials and Methods: From January 2019 to November 2021, 133 patients with low rectal cancer underwent single-incision (n = 27) or conventional (n = 106) methods of low anterior rectal resection surgery with ileostomy. All patients were balanced by propensity score matching for basic information in a ratio of 1:2, resulting in 27 and 54 in SILS and CLS groups, respectively. Results: Relative to the CLS group, the SILS group exhibited fewer leucocyte changes, shorter time to first exhaust and first bowel sounds, shorter length of hospital stay and lower Visual Analogue Score on post-operative days (POD2) and POD3. Intraoperative or post-operative complications or readmissions were comparable between the two groups. The oncologic results remained consistent between the two groups other than the number of lymph nodes dissected in group no. 253. Conclusions: Single-incision laparoscopic low rectal resection surgery through the ileostomy site has advantages in terms of reduced post-operative pain, shorter post-operative exhaust time and length of hospital stay while also achieving oncologic outcomes similar to those of conventional laparoscopy. It can be an alternative procedure for patients with low rectal cancer who require ileostomy.

Indexed as

Ileostomylow rectal cancersingle-incision laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36695238
PMCPMC10449036
OpenAlexW4318026244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.