Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694838›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Can the Future of ID Escape the Inertial Dogma of Its Past? The Exemplars of Shorter Is Better and Oral Is the New IV.

Kusha Davar, Devin Clark, Robert M Centor, Fernando Dominguez, Bassam Ghanem, Rachael Lee, Todd C Lee, Emily G McDonald, Matthew C Phillips, Parham Sendi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Why we do what we do: a survey of ID providers about oral antibiotics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  9. Top unanswered questions in antimicrobial management of necrotizing soft tissue infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Legends, dogmas, presumptions, and demystifications in antibiotic therapy.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Short versus long treatment duration for streptococcal bloodstream infection.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Kusha DavarLos Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-2264
Devin ClarkLos Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Robert M CentorDepartment of Medicine, Birmingham Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Fernando DominguezLos Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bassam GhanemKing Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rachael LeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Todd C LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-4239
Emily G McDonaldDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0783-0624
Matthew C PhillipsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Parham SendiInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Brad SpellbergLos Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC+USC) Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of Southern California · USMcGill University · CABirmingham VA Medical Center · USHarvard University · USKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like all fields of medicine, Infectious Diseases is rife with dogma that underpins much clinical practice. In this study, we discuss 2 specific examples of historical practice that have been overturned recently by numerous prospective studies: traditional durations of antimicrobial therapy and the necessity of intravenous (IV)-only therapy for specific infectious syndromes. These dogmas are based on uncontrolled case series from >50 years ago, amplified by the opinions of eminent experts. In contrast, more than 120 modern, randomized controlled trials have established that shorter durations of therapy are equally effective for many infections. Furthermore, 21 concordant randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that oral antibiotic therapy is at least as effective as IV-only therapy for osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and endocarditis. Nevertheless, practitioners in many clinical settings remain refractory to adopting these changes. It is time for Infectious Diseases to move beyond its history of eminent opinion-based medicine and truly into the era of evidenced-based medicine.

Indexed as

antibioticdogmaevidenced-based medicineoral antibioticsshorter is better

Identifiers

PMID36694838
PMCPMC9853939
OpenAlexW4313332424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.