Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694692›Full record

ArticleRevue francaise d'allergologie (2009)2023

[Suspected allergy to COVID-19 vaccines: A retrospective study of 320 patients].

L Gosse, F Hacard, L Crumbach, M Vancappel, F Bérard, J F Nicolas, T Vial, L Juillard, C Dussard, A Nosbaum

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revue francaise d'allergologie (2009), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Suspicion of allergy to anti-COVID-19 vaccines].Revue francaise d'allergologie (2009) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

L GosseHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
F HacardHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
L CrumbachHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
M VancappelHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
F BérardHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
J F NicolasHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
T VialCentre régional de pharmacovigilance de Lyon, France.
L JuillardHospices civils de Lyon, service de néphrologie, hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.
C DussardEA 4129 P2S parcours santé systémique, université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, université de Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
A NosbaumHospices civils de Lyon, service d'allergologie et immunologie clinique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRInserm · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRNetherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The health context with COVID-19 pandemic has led to fast development of many vaccines against the SarS-Cov-2 virus. Four of them are currently available in France and contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 as excipients, already described as causing anaphylaxis. French recommendations have been suggested by allergology authorities and proposed a course of action in the event of a suspected allergy to these vaccines. Thus, allergies to excipients were the only contraindication to COVID-19 vaccination. Our main objective was to determine the impact of these allergology vaccine recommendations on the management of these patients. Our secondary objective was to determine prevalence of true allergies to these vaccines. Materials and methods: We conducted a unicentric descriptive retrospective study with all patients over 18 years of age referred for an allergological opinion before or after an injection of one of the anti-COVID-19 vaccines. Nineteen patients were classified into different interest groups, based on french recommendations. Results: The vast majority of patients did not require a pre-vaccination allergological assessment. Indeed, only 25 patients received skin tests prior to vaccination. The rest of patients were able to be vaccinated without allergological assessment. Patients not vaccinated due to allergy to excipients represent less than 1% of the population ( Conclusion: French recommendations made it possible to vaccinate the vast majority of patients included in our study. Allergy to PEG, polysorbate or their derivatives, the only contraindication to anti-COVID vaccination, according to the recommendations of February 2021, remains rare. Today, several authors propose tolerance inductions allowing the vaccination of patients allergic to PEGs or their derivatives with good tolerance.

Indexed as

Effets secondaires vaccinauxSARS COV 2VaccinationVaccination anti COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID36694692
PMCPMC9850855
OpenAlexW4318025788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.