Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694615›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2023

Gaussian bare-bone slime mould algorithm: performance optimization and case studies on truss structures.

Shubiao Wu, Ali Asghar Heidari, Siyang Zhang, Fangjun Kuang, Huiling Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Slime Mould Algorithm: A Comprehensive Survey.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shubiao WuDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035 China.
Ali Asghar HeidariSchool of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Siyang ZhangSchool of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Fangjun KuangSchool of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Huiling ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325035 China.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-9693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The slime mould algorithm (SMA) is a new meta-heuristic algorithm recently proposed. The algorithm is inspired by the foraging behavior of polycephalus slime moulds. It simulates the behavior and morphological changes of slime moulds during foraging through adaptive weights. Although the original SMA's performance is better than most swarm intelligence algorithms, it still has shortcomings, such as quickly falling into local optimal values and insufficient exploitation. This paper proposes a Gaussian barebone mutation enhanced SMA (GBSMA) to alleviate the original SMA's shortcomings. First of all, the Gaussian function in the Gaussian barebone accelerates the convergence while also expanding the search space, which improves the algorithm exploration and exploitation capabilities. Secondly, the differential evolution (DE) update strategy in the Gaussian barebone, using Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-022-10370-7.

Indexed as

Engineering optimizationGaussian bareboneGlobal optimizationSlime mould algorithm

Identifiers

PMID36694615
PMCPMC9853503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.