ArticleCureus2022
Approach and Clinical Practice of Functional Movement Disorders Among Neurologists in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Education Research: Targeting Self-Described Knowledge Gaps to Improve Functional Neurologic Disorder Education Among Clinicians.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Functional neurological disorder in Europe: regional differences in education and health policy.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Functional movement disorders (FMDs) are neurological disorders that consist of abnormal and involuntary movements that have no specific organic cause. Given the prevalence of FMDs and the scarcity of information on neurologists' approaches to FMDs, we aimed to assess the neurologists' approaches and clinical practice in managing FMDs in Saudi Arabia. Methods A validated online questionnaire in English was used. The data were collected through a self-reported questionnaire. The data were analyzed using the statistical software IBM SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Armonk, NY). Results A total of 231 neurologists completed the study survey. A total of 129 (55.8%) were males. Regarding the predictors for a diagnosis other than FMD, the highest rating predictor was for evidence of physical injury and lack of psychiatric history of psychological stressors, while the lowest rating was for the male gender. Regarding the effective treatment strategies of FMD, the most effective treatment strategy reported by the clinicians was patient education, while the least was alternative or complementary medicine. The management ability of clinicians was generally restricted by cultural beliefs about psychological illnesses and the availability of referral services. The reported predictors by clinicians for a better prognosis of FMD include acceptance of the diagnosis by the patient followed by identification and management of psychological stressors and concurrent psychiatric disorder and a supportive social network. Generally, the most used terminology in this study was "functional movement disorder". Conclusions There is a variation in the approach and clinical practice of FMD among neurologists in Saudi Arabia. Shared knowledge regarding diagnosis and effective management is crucial. Collaborative efforts are required to establish practice guidelines in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.