ArticleCureus2022
Types of Sliding Calcaneal Osteotomy Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Different methods are used to fix a sliding calcaneal osteotomy for hindfoot varus and valgus deformity. However, information about the effectiveness and limitations of each method is limited. In this meta-analysis, we compare the hardware removal rate, union rate, and complications of three different methods of fixation: plate, headed screw, and headless screw. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of published articles were carried out, following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We investigated diverse databases, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), to search articles reporting the use of different calcaneal osteotomy fixations from database inception to October 2021. The primary outcome was the hardware removal rate, and the secondary outcomes of interest were the union rate and complications. Results Of 1,903 articles identified, eight met the inclusion criteria. The highest risk ratio (RR) of the hardware removal rate was detected in the headed screw method (RR: 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.58). However, the highest RR of nonunion was detected in the plate method (RR: 0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.07). Regarding complications (infections), the headed screw method presented the highest RR of infection (RR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.06-0.97). Conclusion This comprehensive review and meta-analysis revealed that the headless screw method may be the most effective fixation option for calcaneal osteotomy with the lowest risk of hardware removal rate, nonunion rate, and complications. Obviously, further studies are needed on a larger number of patients to confirm this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.