Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694222›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2023

A model for predicting both breast cancer risk and non-breast cancer death among women > 55 years old.

Mara A Schonberg, Emily A Wolfson, A Heather Eliassen, Kimberly A Bertrand, Yurii B Shvetsov, Bernard A Rosner, Julie R Palmer, Long H Ngo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Social Drivers of Guideline-Discordant Breast Cancer Screening by Age and Mortality Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mara A Schonberg *Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. mschonbe@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-5922
Emily A Wolfson *Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
A Heather EliassenDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-6609
Kimberly A BertrandSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4565-7618
Yurii B ShvetsovUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-9618
Bernard A RosnerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-0056
Julie R Palmer *Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-335X
Long H Ngo *Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-7981
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROSNER, BERNARD A · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GERTRAUD MASKARINEC · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenU01CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Kimberly A. Bertrand, Yvette C Cozier · 2017 to 2026
$24.0M
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
A prediction model to simultaneously estimate personal risk of breast cancer and death from other causes in women aged 55 and olderR01CA242747 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHONBERG, MARA A · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
Improving Breast Cancer Risk Prediction for African American Women: Consideration of Estrogen Receptor Subtype-Specific Risk FactorsR01CA228357 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PALMER, JULIE R · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228357NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242747NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164974NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend shared decision making (SDM) for mammography screening for women ≥ 75 and not screening women with < 10-year life expectancy. High-quality SDM requires consideration of women's breast cancer (BC) risk, life expectancy, and values but is hard to implement because no models simultaneously estimate older women's individualized BC risk and life expectancy.

methodsUsing competing risk regression and data from 83,330 women > 55 years who completed the 2004 Nurses' Health Study (NHS) questionnaire, we developed (in 2/3 of the cohort, n = 55,533) a model to predict 10-year non-breast cancer (BC) death. We considered 60 mortality risk factors and used best-subsets regression, the Akaike information criterion, and c-index, to identify the best-fitting model. We examined model performance in the remaining 1/3 of the NHS cohort (n = 27,777) and among 17,380 Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) participants, ≥ 55 years, who completed the 2009 questionnaire. We then included the identified mortality predictors in a previously developed competing risk BC prediction model and examined model performance for predicting BC risk.

resultsMean age of NHS development cohort participants was 70.1 years (± 7.0); over 10 years, 3.1% developed BC, 0.3% died of BC, and 20.1% died of other causes; NHS validation cohort participants were similar. BWHS participants were younger (mean age 63.7 years [± 6.7]); over 10-years 3.1% developed BC, 0.4% died of BC, and 11.1% died of other causes. The final non-BC death prediction model included 21 variables (age; body mass index [BMI]; physical function [3 measures]; comorbidities [12]; alcohol; smoking; age at menopause; and mammography use). The final BC prediction model included age, BMI, alcohol and hormone use, family history, age at menopause, age at first birth/parity, and breast biopsy history. When risk factor regression coefficients were applied in the validation cohorts, the c-index for predicting 10-year non-BC death was 0.790 (0.784-0.796) in NHS and 0.768 (0.757-0.780) in BWHS; for predicting 5-year BC risk, the c-index was 0.612 (0.538-0.641) in NHS and 0.573 (0.536-0.611) in BWHS.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a novel competing-risk model that predicts 10-year non-BC death and 5-year BC risk. Model risk estimates may help inform SDM around mammography screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedBreastFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPregnancyRisk FactorsWomen's HealthBreast cancer predictionCompeting risksMortality prediction

Identifiers

PMID36694222
PMCPMC9872276
OpenAlexW4317830092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.