Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694201›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2023

Early visual alterations in individuals at-risk of Alzheimer's disease: a multidisciplinary approach.

Inés López-Cuenca, Alberto Nebreda, Alejandra García-Colomo, Elena Salobrar-García, Jaisalmer de Frutos-Lucas, Ricardo Bruña, Ana I Ramírez, Federico Ramirez-Toraño, Juan J Salazar, Ana Barabash and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology in the Retina.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Inés López-Cuenca *Ramon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Nebreda *Center for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Alejandra García-ColomoCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain. algarc23@ucm.es.
Elena Salobrar-GarcíaRamon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Jaisalmer de Frutos-LucasCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Ricardo BruñaCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Ana I RamírezRamon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Federico Ramirez-TorañoCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain.
Juan J SalazarRamon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Ana BarabashHealth Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro GilHealth Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando MaestúHealth Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
José M RamírezRamon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa de HozRamon Castroviejo Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain. rdehoz@med.ucm.es.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESEdith Cowan University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe earliest pathological features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) appear decades before the clinical symptoms. The pathology affects the brain and the eye, leading to retinal structural changes and functional visual alterations. Healthy individuals at high risk of developing AD present alterations in these ophthalmological measures, as well as in resting-state electrophysiological activity. However, it is unknown whether the ophthalmological alterations are related to the visual-related electrophysiological activity. Elucidating this relationship is paramount to understand the mechanisms underlying the early deterioration of the system and an important step in assessing the suitability of these measures as early biomarkers of disease.

methodsIn total, 144 healthy subjects: 105 with family history of AD and 39 without, underwent ophthalmologic analysis, magnetoencephalography recording, and genotyping. A subdivision was made to compare groups with less demographic and more risk differences: 28 high-risk subjects (relatives/APOEɛ4 +) and 16 low-risk (non-relatives/APOEɛ4 -). Differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and macular thickness were evaluated. Correlations between each variable and visual-related electrophysiological measures (M100 latency and time-frequency power) were calculated for each group.

resultsHigh-risk groups showed increased visual acuity. Visual acuity was also related to a lower M100 latency and a greater power time-frequency cluster in the high-risk group. Low-risk groups did not show this relationship. High-risk groups presented trends towards a greater contrast sensitivity that did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. The highest-risk group showed trends towards the thinning of the inner plexiform and inner nuclear layers that did not remain significant after correction. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and macular thickness, and the electrophysiological measures were not significant after correction. The difference between the high- and low- risk groups correlations was no significant.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind, assessing the relationship between ophthalmological and electrophysiological measures in healthy subjects at distinct levels of risk of AD. The results are novel and unexpected, showing an increase in visual acuity among high-risk subjects, who also exhibit a relationship between this measure and visual-related electrophysiological activity. These results have not been previously explored and could constitute a useful object of research as biomarkers for early detection and the evaluation of potential interventions' effectiveness.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersBrainHumansRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAt risk for ADMagnetoencephalographyOptical coherence tomographyVisual function

Identifiers

PMID36694201
PMCPMC9872347
OpenAlexW4317884453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.