Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694161›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review.

Amir Torab-Miandoab, Taha Samad-Soltani, Ahmadreza Jodati, Peyman Rezaei-Hachesu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir Torab-MiandoabDepartment of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golghast St., Tabriz, 5166614711, Iran.
Taha Samad-SoltaniDepartment of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golghast St., Tabriz, 5166614711, Iran.
Ahmadreza JodatiCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Peyman Rezaei-HachesuDepartment of Health Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golghast St., Tabriz, 5166614711, Iran. rezaeip@tbzmed.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of interoperability between health information systems reduces the quality of care provided to patients and wastes resources. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to develop integration mechanisms among the various health information systems. The aim of this review was to investigate the interoperability requirements for heterogeneous health information systems and to summarize and present them.

methodsIn accordance with the PRISMA guideline, a broad electronic search of all literature was conducted on the topic through six databases, including PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase to 25 July 2022. The inclusion criteria were to select English-written articles available in full text with the closest objectives. 36 articles were selected for further analysis.

resultsInteroperability has been raised in the field of health information systems from 2003 and now it is one of the topics of interest to researchers. The projects done in this field are mostly in the national scope and to achieve the electronic health record. HL7 FHIR, CDA, HIPAA and SNOMED-CT, SOA, RIM, XML, API, JAVA and SQL are among the most important requirements for implementing interoperability. In order to guarantee the concept of data exchange, semantic interaction is the best choice because the systems can recognize and process semantically similar information homogeneously.

conclusionsThe health industry has become more complex and has new needs. Interoperability meets this needs by communicating between the output and input of processor systems and making easier to access the data in the required formats.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsElectronic Health RecordsHumansSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineElectronic health recordHealth information systemsHeterogeneousInteroperabilityRequirements

Identifiers

PMID36694161
PMCPMC9875417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.