Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36694074›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Top-down knowledge surpasses selection history in influencing attentional guidance.

Markus Grüner, Florian Goller, Ulrich Ansorge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus GrünerDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria. markus.gruener@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0869-4081
Florian GollerDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2534-2077
Ulrich AnsorgeDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-9942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual attention is influenced by the characteristics of the stimuli (bottom-up), their task relevance (top-down), and prior experience (e.g., selection history and learning). However, it is largely unclear how learning and selection history interact with top-down attentional guidance. We combined trial-and-error learning with a spatial cueing protocol to test whether previously learned target-defining features continued to capture attention if participants were instructed to search for a new target feature (Experiment 1) or had to learn a new target feature (Experiment 2). It turned out that the previously learned feature quickly stopped capturing attention when the target feature changed (Experiment 1; even before participants learned the new target-defining feature, in Experiment 2). Finally, in Experiment 3, in which participants learned to search for targets defined by two redundant features (color and orientation), we found possible reasons for the dominance of the instructed feature over learning. Participants reported using only the target color for their search. Consequently, only cues with a target color captured attention. The unused target orientation only captured attention in participants aware of both target-defining features (13 out of 23) and only if the orientation was presented in the target color. We conclude that knowledge of target-defining features and their use as search criterion is critical for attentional guidance, while previously learned target features either influence attentional guidance only contingent on such deliberately selected top-down based attentional control settings or may influence visual search but not attentional guidance.

Indexed as

CuesLearningColor PerceptionHumansReaction TimeAttentional guidanceLearningSelection historyTop-down attention

Identifiers

PMID36694074
PMCPMC10167147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.