ArticleScientific reports2023
Investigation of optimal convolutional neural network conditions for thyroid ultrasound image analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing automatic diagnosis of thyroid nodules from ultrasound scans leveraging deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Journal of ultrasonography · 2025Article
- A Multi-View Deep Learning Model for Thyroid Nodules Detection and Characterization in Ultrasound Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural network models have been used to analyze thyroid ultrasound (US) images and stratify malignancy risk of the thyroid nodules. We investigated the optimal neural network condition for thyroid US image analysis. We compared scratch and transfer learning models, performed stress tests in 10% increments, and compared the performance of three threshold values. All validation results indicated superiority of the transfer learning model over the scratch model. Stress test indicated that training the algorithm using 3902 images (70%) resulted in a performance which was similar to the full dataset (5575). Threshold 0.3 yielded high sensitivity (1% false negative) and low specificity (72% false positive), while 0.7 gave low sensitivity (22% false negative) and high specificity (23% false positive). Here we showed that transfer learning was more effective than scratch learning in terms of area under curve, sensitivity, specificity and negative/positive predictive value, that about 3900 images were minimally required to demonstrate an acceptable performance, and that algorithm performance can be customized according to the population characteristics by adjusting threshold value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.