ArticleScientific reports2023
A cross-sectional study of ophthalmologic examination findings in 5385 Koreans presenting with intermittent exotropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of refractive errors in children with intermittent exotropia compared with the general population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mean Apparent Propagator MRI: A Potential Imaging Biomarker of Brain Microstructural Alterations in Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Intermittent Exotropia: A Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Study of 415 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Intermittent Exotropia in Children with Myopia and Myopic Anisometropia.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Clinical Features According to the Type of Intermittent Exotropia: Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Difference of Parental Level of Concerns on Surgery according to the Perspectives and Characteristic among Pediatrics with Intermittent Exotropia.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- Sensory outcome of exotropia surgery in Thailand: a retrospective multicenter study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Impact of simultaneous eyelid and exotropia surgery on the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients with intermittent exotropia: a retrospective observational study.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2025Article
- Exploring the Link: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence and Association Between Refractive Errors and Intermittent Exotropia.Health science reports · 2024Review
- Self-Reported Findings of the Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study Questionnaire.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS) was a retrospective, cross-sectional and multicenter study for the investigation of intermittent exotropia involved 65 strabismus specialists from 53 institutions in Korea. Purpose of this study was to present ophthalmologic findings of intermittent exotropia from the KIEMS. Consecutive patients with intermittent exotropia of ≥ 8 prism diopters (PD) at distance or near fixation were included. Best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction data, angles of deviation at several cardinal positions, ocular dominance, fusion control, oblique muscle function, and binocular sensory outcomes were collected. A total of 5385 participants (2793 females; age 8.2 years) were included. Non-dominant eye was more myopic than the dominant eye (- 0.60 vs. - 0.47 diopters, P < 0.001). Mean exodeviation angles were 23.5 PD at distance and 25.0 PD at near fixation. Basic type (86.2%) was the most, followed by convergence insufficiency (9.4%) and divergence excess (4.4%) types. Alternating ocular dominance and good fusion control were more common at near than at distance fixation. Good stereopsis at 40 cm was observed in 49.3% in Titmus stereo test (≤ 60 arcsec) and in 71.0% in Randot stereo test (≤ 63 arcsec). Intermittent exotropia was mostly diagnosed in childhood and patients with the condition showed relatively good binocular functions. This study may provide objective findings of intermittent exotropia in a most reliable way, given that the study included a large study population and investigated comprehensive ophthalmology examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.