Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693833›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Neural mechanisms underlying the hierarchical construction of perceived aesthetic value.

Kiyohito Iigaya, Sanghyun Yi, Iman A Wahle, Sandy Tanwisuth, Logan Cross, John P O'Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling the factors of aesthetic preferences with explainable AI.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Beholder's Share: Bridging art and neuroscience to study individual differences in subjective experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Body dysmorphic disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Naturalistic reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A clearing in the objectivity of aesthetics?Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiyohito IigayaDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA. ki2151@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-8432
Sanghyun YiDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-6523
Iman A WahleDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
Sandy TanwisuthDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
Logan CrossDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
John P O'DohertyDivision of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA. jdoherty@caltech.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0016-3531

Funding

The Neurobiology of Social Decision-Making: Social Inference and ContextP50MH094258 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADOLPHS, RALPH · 2012 to 2021
$18.6M
Determining the neural substrates of model-based and model-free reinforcement-learning during Pavlovian conditioning (Minority Supplement)R01DA040011 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040011NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about how the brain computes the perceived aesthetic value of complex stimuli such as visual art. Here, we used computational methods in combination with functional neuroimaging to provide evidence that the aesthetic value of a visual stimulus is computed in a hierarchical manner via a weighted integration over both low and high level stimulus features contained in early and late visual cortex, extending into parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices. Feature representations in parietal and lateral prefrontal cortex may in turn be utilized to produce an overall aesthetic value in the medial prefrontal cortex. Such brain-wide computations are not only consistent with a feature-based mechanism for value construction, but also resemble computations performed by a deep convolutional neural network. Our findings thus shed light on the existence of a general neurocomputational mechanism for rapidly and flexibly producing value judgements across an array of complex novel stimuli and situations.

Indexed as

BrainVisual CortexBrain MappingEstheticsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID36693833
PMCPMC9873760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.