Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693342›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Safety of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Janek Salatzki, Andreas Ochs, Nadja Kirchgäßner, Jannick Heins, Sebastian Seitz, Hauke Hund, Derliz Mereles, Matthias G Friedrich, Hugo A Katus, Norbert Frey and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Safety of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Janek SalatzkiDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-474X
Andreas OchsDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7454-7541
Nadja KirchgäßnerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jannick HeinsDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian SeitzDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hauke HundDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Derliz MerelesDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias G FriedrichDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Norbert FreyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian AndréDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marco M OchsDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDobutamine and adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is relatively contraindicated in patients with moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). We aimed to determine the safety of dobutamine and adenosine stress CMR in patients with moderate to severe AS.

methodsIn this retrospective study patients with AS who underwent either dobutamine or adenosine stress CMR for exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease were enrolled. We recorded clinical data, CMR and echocardiography findings, and complications as well as minor symptoms. Patients with AS were compared to matched individuals without AS.

resultsA total of 187 patients with AS were identified and compared to age-, gender- and body mass index-matched 187 patients without AS. No severe complications were reported in the study nor the control group. The reported frequency of non-severe complications and minor symptoms were similar between the study and the control groups. Nineteen patients with AS experienced non-severe complications or minor symptoms during dobutamine stress CMR compared to eighteen patients without AS (p = 0.855). One patient with AS and two patients without AS undergoing adenosine stress CMR experienced minor symptoms (p = 0.562). Four examinations were aborted because of chest pain, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and third-degree atrioventricular block. Inducible ischaemia, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, prior stroke and age were associated with a higher incidence of complications and minor symptoms.

conclusionsModerate to severe AS was not associated with complications during CMR stress test. The incidence of non-severe complications and minor symptoms was greater with dobutamine.

Indexed as

AdenosineAortic valve stenosisDobutamineMagnetic resonance imagingSafety

Identifiers

PMID36693342
PMCPMC9880345
OpenAlexW4312728575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.