Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693129›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2023

Transfer of Learned Cognitive Flexibility to Novel Stimuli and Task Sets.

Tanya Wen, Raphael M Geddert, Seth Madlon-Kay, Tobias Egner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Learning environment-specific learning rates.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanya WenCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-7831
Raphael M GeddertCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.
Seth Madlon-KayDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine.
Tobias EgnerCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Meta-FlexibilityR01MH116967 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EGNER, TOBIAS · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive behavior requires learning about the structure of one's environment to derive optimal action policies, and previous studies have documented transfer of such structural knowledge to bias choices in new environments. Here, we asked whether people could also acquire and transfer more abstract knowledge across different task environments, specifically expectations about cognitive control demands. Over three experiments, participants (Amazon Mechanical Turk workers;

Indexed as

CognitionLearningAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedReinforcement, PsychologyTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adultcognitive flexibilitygeneralizationmeta-flexibilityopen dataopen materialsreinforcement learningtask switching

Identifiers

PMID36693129
PMCPMC10236430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.