Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693081›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2023

The cost and cost-effectiveness of novel tuberculosis vaccines in low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study.

Allison Portnoy, Rebecca A Clark, Matthew Quaife, Chathika K Weerasuriya, Christinah Mukandavire, Roel Bakker, Arminder K Deol, Shelly Malhotra, Nebiat Gebreselassie, Matteo Zignol and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Allison PortnoyCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-1324
Rebecca A ClarkTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-0301
Matthew QuaifeTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9291-1511
Chathika K WeerasuriyaTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7364-1026
Christinah MukandavireTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-0361
Roel BakkerTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-0944
Arminder K DeolTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Shelly MalhotraMarket Access, Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-386X
Nebiat GebreselassieGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Matteo ZignolGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
So Yoon SimDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Raymond C W HutubessyDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Inés Garcia BaenaGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nobuyuki NishikioriGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0962-8868
Mark JitCentre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6658-8255
Richard G WhiteTB Modelling Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4410-6635
Nicolas A MenziesCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-016X
University of London · GBWorld Health Organization · CHHarvard Global Health Institute · USInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Defining drivers of TB transmission in the era of universal ART, and implications for finding the walking wellR01AI147321 · NIAID · LONDON SCH/HYGIENE & TROPICAL MEDICINE · PI GRANT, ALISON · 2019 to 2024
$2.3M
Medical Research Council MR/N013638/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147321Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 218261/Z/19/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) is preventable and curable but eliminating it has proven challenging. Safe and effective TB vaccines that can rapidly reduce disease burden are essential for achieving TB elimination. We assessed future costs, cost-savings, and cost-effectiveness of introducing novel TB vaccines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for a range of product characteristics and delivery strategies. METHODS AND

findingsWe developed a system of epidemiological and economic models, calibrated to demographic, epidemiological, and health service data in 105 LMICs. For each country, we assessed the likely future course of TB-related outcomes under several vaccine introduction scenarios, compared to a "no-new-vaccine" counterfactual. Vaccine scenarios considered 2 vaccine product profiles (1 targeted at infants, 1 at adolescents/adults), both assumed to prevent progression to active TB. Key economic inputs were derived from the Global Health Cost Consortium, World Health Organization (WHO) patient cost surveys, and the published literature. We estimated the incremental impact of vaccine introduction for a range of health and economic outcomes. In the base-case, we assumed a vaccine price of $4.60 and used a 1× per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) cost-effectiveness threshold (both varied in sensitivity analyses). Vaccine introduction was estimated to require substantial near-term resources, offset by future cost-savings from averted TB burden. From a health system perspective, adolescent/adult vaccination was cost-effective in 64 of 105 LMICs. From a societal perspective (including productivity gains and averted patient costs), adolescent/adult vaccination was projected to be cost-effective in 73 of 105 LMICs and cost-saving in 58 of 105 LMICs, including 96% of countries with higher TB burden. When considering the monetized value of health gains, we estimated that introduction of an adolescent/adult vaccine could produce $283 to 474 billion in economic benefits by 2050. Limited data availability required assumptions and extrapolations that may omit important country-level heterogeneity in epidemiology and costs.

conclusionsTB vaccination would be highly impactful and cost-effective in most LMICs. Further efforts are needed for future development, adoption, and implementation of novel TB vaccines.

Indexed as

TuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloping CountriesHumansInfantVaccinationTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36693081
PMCPMC9873163
OpenAlexW4317851268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.