Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

"SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.

Karina Dahl Steffensen, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Kurt Espersen, Susanne Lauth, Peter Fosgrau, Anders Meinert Pedersen, Peter Sigerseth Groen, Christian Sauvr, Karina Olling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Karina Dahl SteffensenCenter for Shared Decision Making, Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Dorte Gilså HansenCenter for Shared Decision Making, Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Kurt EspersenRegion of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Susanne LauthWest Jutland Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Peter FosgrauHospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Anders Meinert PedersenMental Health Services, Vejle, Region of Southern Denmark.
Peter Sigerseth GroenDepartment of Clinical Development, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Christian SauvrDepartment of Clinical Development, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Karina OllingCenter for Shared Decision Making, Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-0547
Odense University Hospital · DKRegion of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DKMental Health Services · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision making (SDM) is a core element in the meeting between patient and healthcare professionals, but has proved difficult to implement and sustain in routine clinical practice. One of five Danish regions set out to succeed and to develop a model that ensures lasting SDM based on learnings from large-scale real-world implementation initiatives that go beyond the 'barriers' and 'facilitators' research approach. This paper describes this process and development of a generic implementation model, SDM:HOSP.

methodsThis project was carried out in the Region of Southern Denmark with five major hospital units. Based on existing theory of SDM, SDM implementation, implementation science and improvement methodology, a process of four phases were described; development of conceptual elements, field-testing, evaluation, and development of the final implementation model. The conceptual elements developed aimed to prepare leaders, train SDM teachers, teach clinicians to perform SDM, support development of patient decision aids, and support systematic planning, execution and follow-up. Field testing was done including continuous participant evaluations and an overall evaluation after one year.

resultsData from field testing and learnings from the implementation process, illustrated the need for a dynamic and easy adjustable model. The final SDM:HOSP model included four themes; i)Training of Leaders, ii) Training of Teachers and Clinicians, iii) Decision Helper, and iv) 'Process', each with details in three levels, 1) shared elements, 2) recommendations, and 3) local adaption.

conclusionsA feasible and acceptable model for implementation of SDM across hospitals and departments that accounts for different organizations and cultures was developed. The overall design can easily be adapted to other organizations and can be adjusted to fit the specific organization and culture. The results from the ongoing and overall evaluation suggest promising avenues for future work in further testing and research of the usability of the model.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedAminoacridinesDecision Support TechniquesHumansPatient ParticipationAminoacridinesSDM

Identifiers

PMID36693036
PMCPMC9873173
OpenAlexW4317851306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.