Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36693021›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2023

School-age outcomes among IVF-conceived children: A population-wide cohort study.

Amber L Kennedy, Beverley J Vollenhoven, Richard J Hiscock, Catharyn J Stern, Susan P Walker, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Jon L Quach, Roxanne Hastie, David Wilkinson, John McBain and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. School outcomes after HIE: a population-based cohort study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Reproductive Health-Oriented Development in Assisted Reproductive Technologies].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amber L KennedyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-8102
Beverley J VollenhovenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-3994
Richard J HiscockDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5375-041X
Catharyn J SternDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan P WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeanie L Y CheongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-0455
Jon L QuachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Roxanne HastieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-1943
David WilkinsonMercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
John McBainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lyle C GurrinMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Vivien MacLachlanMonash IVF, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Franca AgrestaMelbourne IVF, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Susan P BaohmMonash IVF, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen TongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-0586
Anthea C LindquistDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8662-5188
The University of Melbourne · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUMonash IVF · AUMercy Hospital for Women · AUMonash Health · AUMyer Foundation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) is a common mode of conception. Understanding the long-term implications for these children is important. The aim of this study was to determine the causal effect of IVF conception on primary school-age childhood developmental and educational outcomes, compared with outcomes following spontaneous conception. METHODS AND

findingsCausal inference methods were used to analyse observational data in a way that emulates a target randomised clinical trial. The study cohort comprised statewide linked maternal and childhood administrative data. Participants included singleton infants conceived spontaneously or via IVF, born in Victoria, Australia between 2005 and 2014 and who had school-age developmental and educational outcomes assessed. The exposure examined was conception via IVF, with spontaneous conception the control condition. Two outcome measures were assessed. The first, childhood developmental vulnerability at school entry (age 4 to 6), was assessed using the Australian Early Developmental Census (AEDC) (n = 173,200) and defined as scoring <10th percentile in ≥2/5 developmental domains (physical health and wellbeing, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills, communication skills, and general knowledge). The second, educational outcome at age 7 to 9, was assessed using National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) data (n = 342,311) and defined by overall z-score across 5 domains (grammar and punctuation, reading, writing, spelling, and numeracy). Inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment was used to estimate population average causal effects. The study included 412,713 children across the 2 outcome cohorts. Linked records were available for 4,697 IVF-conceived cases and 168,503 controls for AEDC, and 8,976 cases and 333,335 controls for NAPLAN. There was no causal effect of IVF-conception on the risk of developmental vulnerability at school-entry compared with spontaneously conceived children (AEDC metrics), with an adjusted risk difference of -0.3% (95% CI -3.7% to 3.1%) and an adjusted risk ratio of 0.97 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.25). At age 7 to 9 years, there was no causal effect of IVF-conception on the NAPLAN overall z-score, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.030 (95% CI -0.018 to 0.077) between IVF- and spontaneously conceived children. The models were adjusted for sex at birth, age at assessment, language background other than English, socioeconomic status, maternal age, parity, and education. Study limitations included the use of observational data, the potential for unmeasured confounding, the presence of missing data, and the necessary restriction of the cohort to children attending school.

conclusionsIn this analysis, under the given causal assumptions, the school-age developmental and educational outcomes for children conceived by IVF are equivalent to those of spontaneously conceived children. These findings provide important reassurance for current and prospective parents and for clinicians.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroSchoolsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesVictoria

Identifiers

PMID36693021
PMCPMC9873192
OpenAlexW4317870854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.