Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692954›Full record

Trial reportJCI insight2023

Pursuing personalized medicine for depression by targeting the lateral or medial prefrontal cortex with Deep TMS.

Abraham Zangen, Samuel Zibman, Aron Tendler, Noam Barnea-Ygael, Uri Alyagon, Daniel M Blumberger, Geoffrey Grammer, Hadar Shalev, Tatiana Gulevski, Tanya Vapnik and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCI insight, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03012724 (A Prospective Multicenter Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Demonstrate That the Efficacy of the H7-Coil is as Good as the Efficacy of the H1-Coil Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03012724 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective Multicenter Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Demonstrate That the Efficacy of the H7-Coil is as Good as the Efficacy of the H1-Coil Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (DTMS) in Subjects With Major Depression Disorder (MDD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrainswayRan2017 to 2020Enrolled106ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)ArmsH7-Coil, H1-Coil
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation coil design and multi-objective slime mould algorithm].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation.Biological psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Abraham ZangenBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Samuel ZibmanBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Aron TendlerAdvanced Mental Health Care Inc., Royal Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
Noam Barnea-YgaelBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Uri AlyagonBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Geoffrey GrammerGreenbrook TMS NeuroHealth, McLean, Virginia, USA.
Hadar ShalevBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Tatiana GulevskiBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Tanya VapnikPacific Institute of Medical Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Alexander BystritskyPacific Institute of Medical Research, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Igor FilipčićPsychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
David FeifelKadima Neuropsychiatry Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ahava SteinA. Stein - Regulatory Affairs Consulting Ltd, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Frederic DeutschBioStats Statistical Consulting Ltd., Modiin, Israel.
Yiftach RothBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Mark S GeorgeMedical University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USAdvanced Mental Health Care · USCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMedical University of South Carolina · USMuseum of Contemporary Art San Diego · USPsychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan · HRWestern Digital (Israel) · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDMajor depressive disorder (MDD) can benefit from novel interventions and personalization. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) targeting the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) using the H1 coil was FDA cleared for treatment of MDD. However, recent preliminary data indicate that targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) using the H7 coil might induce outcomes that are as good or even better. Here, we explored whether Deep TMS targeting the MPFC is noninferior to targeting the LPFC and whether electrophysiological or clinical markers for patient selection can be identified.METHODSThe present prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled 169 patients with MDD for whom antidepressants failed in the current episode. Patients were randomized to receive 24 Deep TMS sessions over 6 weeks, using either the H1 coil or the H7 coil. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to week 6 in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores.RESULTSClinical efficacy and safety profiles were similar and not significantly different between groups, with response rates of 60.9% for the H1 coil and 64.2% for the H7 coil. Moreover, brain activity measured by EEG during the first treatment session correlated with clinical outcomes in a coil-specific manner, and a cluster of baseline clinical symptoms was found to potentially distinguish between patients who can benefit from each Deep TMS target.CONCLUSIONThis study provides a treatment option for MDD, using the H7 coil, and initial guidance to differentiate between patients likely to respond to LPFC versus MPFC stimulation targets, which require further validation studies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03012724.FUNDINGBrainsWay Ltd.

Indexed as

DepressionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansPrecision MedicinePrefrontal CortexProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBehaviorClinical TrialsDepressionNeuroimagingNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36692954
PMCPMC9977507
OpenAlexW4317869069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.