ArticleJMIR medical education2023
Implementation of Virtual Reality in Health Professions Education: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facing fears in virtual worlds: A systematic review and meta-analysis on immersive VR therapy for children and adolescents with social anxiety and related disorders.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Virtual Reality for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Healthcare Professionals Training: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of VR and traditional training in medical education for mass casualty management: an OSCE-based randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Evaluating Whether Nonimmersion Virtual Reality Simulation Training Improves Nursing Competency in Isolation Wards: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- The Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Extended Reality (MCDA-XR) Governance Framework for Health Care Adoption: Mixed Methods Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Peer Effects on Safety and Productivity in a Simulated Workplace Through Usability and Ecological Validity Testing of a Nonimmersive Virtual Simulation With University Students: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Virtual reality simulation for chemotherapy drug spill management training in pharmacy education: A cohort-allocated crossover quasi-experimental study in Taiwan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Virtual Reality Simulation in Postgraduate Pediatric Critical Care Training Based on Trainee Perceptions in London: Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Serious Games in Nursing Education: Scoping Review of Applications, Effectiveness, and Future Directions.JMIR serious games · 2026Review
- Developing and Integrating Virtual Reality Courses in Medical Education: Tutorial and Implementation Guideline Informed by Best Practices From the National Project "medical tr.AI.ning".JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Development and Initial Evaluation of Specific Immersive Competence in Virtual Reality-Based Medical Assessments: Exploratory Observational Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Observational
- Dopamine, Distraction, and Disruption: Perspectives on How Technology and Generation Z Are Reshaping Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Training social care staff in promoting self-determination and nutritional health for people with intellectual disabilities using 360BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Immersive competence as a source of bias in virtual reality clinical assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of 3D Virtual Reality on Postural Control in Young Adults: Clinical and Practical Implications.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Stepping into the virtual ward: a qualitative study on first-year residents' experiences with VR simulation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Development of Therapeutic Competencies in Health Care Students: Qualitative Focus Group Study Using 360-Degree Video and Virtual Reality Technology.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- SomaVR: A low-cost virtual reality platform and implementation framework for medical education in resource-limited settings.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- UnitedXR Europe 2025: Aligning Health Care Extended Reality.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Impact of a virtual reality-enhanced learning program for maternal positioning in midwifery students: an exploratory multicenter pre-post study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality has been gaining ground in health professions education and may offer students a platform to experience and master situations without endangering patients or themselves. When implemented effectively, virtual reality technologies may enable highly engaging learning activities and interactive simulations. However, implementation processes present challenges, and the key to successful implementation is identifying barriers and facilitators as well as finding strategies to address them.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify the literature on virtual reality implementation in health professions education, identify barriers to and facilitators of implementation, and highlight gaps in the literature in this area.
methodsThe scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis methodologies. Electronic searches were conducted in the Academic Search Elite, Education Source, and CINAHL databases on January 5, 2022, in Google Scholar on February 2 and November 18, 2022, and in PubMed database on November 18, 2022. We conducted hand searches of key items, reference tracking, and citation tracking and searches on government webpages on February 2, 2022. At least 2 reviewers screened the identified literature. Eligible studies were considered based on predefined inclusion criteria. The results of the identified items were analyzed and synthesized using qualitative content analysis.
resultsWe included 7 papers and identified 7 categories related to facilitators of and barriers to implementation-collaborative participation, availability, expenses, guidelines, technology, careful design and evaluation, and training-and developed a model that links the categories to the 4 constructs from Carl May's general theory of implementation. All the included reports provided recommendations for implementation, including recommendations for careful design and evaluation, training of faculty and students, and faculty presence during use.
conclusionsVirtual reality implementation in health professions education appears to be a new and underexplored research field. This scoping review has several limitations, including definitions and search words, language, and that we did not assess the included papers' quality. Important implications from our findings are that ensuring faculty's and students' competence in using virtual reality technology is necessary for the implementation processes. Collaborative participation by including end users in the development process is another factor that may ensure successful implementation in higher education contexts. To ensure stakeholders' motivation and potential to use virtual reality, faculty and students could be invited to participate in the development process to ensure that the educational content is valued. Moreover, technological challenges and usability issues should be resolved before implementation to ensure that pedagogical content is the focus. This accentuates the importance of piloting, sufficient time resources, basic testing, and sharing of experiences before implementation. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/37222.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.