Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692683›Full record

ReviewPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Knee positioning systems for X-ray environment: a literature review.

Catarina Lopes, Adelio Vilaca, Cláudia Rocha, Joaquim Mendes

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catarina LopesFaculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. up201606195@up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-3527
Adelio Vilaca *Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, Porto, Rua Jorge de Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-9168
Cláudia Rocha *Centre for Robotics in Industry and Intelligent Systems, Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-0346
Joaquim MendesFaculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal. jgabriel@fe.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-1879
Universidade do Porto · PTINESC TEC · PTNational Institute of Statistics and Geography · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The knee is one of the most stressed joints of the human body, being susceptible to ligament injuries and degenerative diseases. Due to the rising incidence of knee pathologies, the number of knee X-rays acquired is also increasing. Such X-rays are obtained for the diagnosis of knee injuries, the evaluation of the knee before and after surgery, and the monitoring of the knee joint's stability. These types of diagnosis and monitoring of the knee usually involve radiography under physical stress. This widely used medical tool provides a more objective analysis of the measurement of the knee laxity than a physical examination does, involving knee stress tests, such as valgus, varus, and Lachman. Despite being an improvement to physical examination regarding the physician's bias, stress radiography is still performed manually in a lot of healthcare facilities. To avoid exposing the physician to radiation and to decrease the number of X-ray images rejected due to inadequate positioning of the patient or the presence of artefacts, positioning systems for stress radiography of the knee have been developed. This review analyses knee positioning systems for X-ray environment, concluding that they have improved the objectivity and reproducibility during stress radiographs, but have failed to either be radiolucent or versatile with a simple ergonomic set-up.

Indexed as

KneeKnee JointHumansRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsX-RaysKnee jointLachman testPositioning systemStress radiographyValgus stressVarus stress

Identifiers

PMID36692683
PMCPMC10030541
OpenAlexW4317871328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.