Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692668›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Chemotherapy refusal and subsequent survival in healthy older women with high genomic risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

McKenzie J White, Madison Kolbow, Saranya Prathibha, Corinne Praska, Jacob S Ankeny, Christopher J LaRocca, Eric H Jensen, Todd M Tuttle, Jane Y C Hui, Schelomo Marmor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring behavioural motivations of treatment refusal in cancer: a Q-methodological approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

McKenzie J WhiteDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Madison KolbowUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Saranya PrathibhaDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Corinne PraskaUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Jacob S AnkenyDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Christopher J LaRoccaDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Eric H JensenDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Todd M TuttleDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Jane Y C HuiDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Schelomo MarmorDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. marm0014@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), and high-risk 21-gene recurrence score (RS) results benefit from chemotherapy. We evaluated chemotherapy refusal and survival in healthy older women with high-RS, ER-positive BC.

methodsRetrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2010-2017) identified women ≥ 65 years of age, with ER-positive, HER2-negative, high-RS (≥ 26) BC. Patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 1, stage III/IV disease, or incomplete data were excluded. Women were compared by chemotherapy receipt or refusal using the Cochrane-Armitage test, multivariable logistical regression modeling, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazards modeling.

results6827 women met study criteria: 5449 (80%) received chemotherapy and 1378 (20%) refused. Compared to women who received chemotherapy, women who refused were older (71 vs 69 years), were diagnosed more recently (2014-2017, 67% vs 61%), and received radiation less frequently (67% vs 71%) (p ≤ 0.05). Refusal was associated with decreased 5-year OS for women 65-74 (92% vs 95%) and 75-79 (85% vs 92%) (p ≤ 0.05), but not for women ≥ 80 years old (84% vs 91%; p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, hazard of death increased with refusal overall (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.2); but, when stratified by age, was not increased for women ≥ 80 years (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80-1.51).

conclusionsAmong healthy women with high-RS, ER-positive BC, chemotherapy refusal was associated with decreased OS for women ages 65-79, but did not impact the OS of women ≥ 80 years old. Genomic testing may have limited utility in this population, warranting prudent shared decision-making and further study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenomicsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateReceptors, EstrogenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenAgedBreast neoplasmsChemotherapy, adjuvantComorbidityEstrogenGenetic testingPhysiciansReceptors

Identifiers

PMID36692668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.