Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692652›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science: atmospheres2023

Development of Volatility Distributions for Organic Matter in Biomass Burning Emissions.

Aditya Sinha, Ingrid George, Amara Holder, William Preston, Michael Hays, Andrew P Grieshop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science: atmospheres, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aditya SinhaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Ingrid GeorgeCenter for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Amara HolderCenter for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
William PrestonCSS Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
Michael HaysCenter for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Andrew P GrieshopDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The volatility distribution of organic emissions from biomass burning and other combustion sources can determine their atmospheric evolution due to partitioning/aging. The gap between measurements and models predicting secondary organic aerosol has been partially attributed to the absence of semi- and intermediate volatility organic compounds (S/I-VOC) in models and measurements. However, S/I-VOCs emitted from these sources and typically quantified using the volatility basis framework (VBS) are not well understood. For example, the amount and composition of S/I-VOCs and their variability across different biomass burning sources such as residential woodstoves, open field burns, and laboratory simulated open burning are uncertain. To address this, a novel filter-in-tube sorbent tube sampling method collected S/I-VOC samples from biomass burning experiments for a range of fuels and combustion conditions. Filter-in-tube samples were analyzed using thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD/GC/MS) for compounds across a wide range of volatilities (saturation concentration

Identifiers

PMID36692652
PMCPMC9728753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.