Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692651›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2023

A pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating outdoor community walking for knee osteoarthritis: walk.

S J J Drummen, S Balogun, A Lahham, K Bennell, R S Hinman, M Callisaya, G Cai, P Otahal, T Winzenberg, Z Wang and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

S J J DrummenMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. Stan.Drummen@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-2551
S BalogunMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
A LahhamMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
K BennellThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
R S HinmanThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
M CallisayaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
G CaiMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
P OtahalMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
T WinzenbergMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Z WangMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
B AntonyMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
I P MunugodaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
J Martel-PelletierOsteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
J P PelletierOsteoarthritis Research Unit, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
F AbramMedical Imaging Research & Development, ArthroLab Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada.
G JonesMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
D AitkenMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité de Montréal · CAAustralian National University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining outdoor walking on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural changes.

methodThis was a 24-week parallel two-arm pilot RCT in Tasmania, Australia. KOA participants were randomized to either a walking plus usual care group or a usual care control group. The walking group trained 3 days/week. The primary outcome was feasibility assessed by changes being required to the study design, recruitment, randomization, program adherence, safety, and retention. Exploratory outcomes were changes in symptoms, physical performance/activity, and MRI measures.

resultsForty participants (mean age 66 years (SD 1.4) and 60% female) were randomized to walking (n = 24) or usual care (n = 16). Simple randomization resulted in a difference in numbers randomized to the two groups. During the study, class sizes were reduced from 10 to 8 participants to improve supervision, and exclusion criteria were added to facilitate program adherence. In the walking group, total program adherence was 70.0% and retention 70.8% at 24 weeks. The walking group had a higher number of mild adverse events and experienced clinically important improvements in symptoms (e.g., visual analogue scale (VAS) knee pain change in the walking group: - 38.7 mm [95% CI - 47.1 to - 30.3] versus usual care group: 4.3 mm [- 4.9 to 13.4]).

conclusionsThis study supports the feasibility of a full-scale RCT given acceptable adherence, retention, randomization, and safety, and recruitment challenges have been identified. Large symptomatic benefits support the clinical usefulness of a subsequent trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12618001097235. Key Points • This pilot study is the first to investigate the effects of an outdoor walking program on knee osteoarthritis clinical outcomes and MRI joint structure, and it indicates that a full-scale RCT is feasible. • The outdoor walking program (plus usual care) resulted in large improvements in self-reported knee osteoarthritis symptoms compared to usual care alone. • The study identified recruitment challenges, and the manuscript explores these in more details and provides recommendations for future studies.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeAgedExerciseFemaleHumansMalePainPilot ProjectsWalkingAerobicExerciseJointMRIStructure

Identifiers

PMID36692651
PMCPMC10102100
OpenAlexW4317868882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.