Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692646›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Laparoscopy in high-risk emergency general surgery reduces intensive care stay, length of stay and mortality.

Iain Wilson, Saqib Rahman, Philip Pucher, Stuart Mercer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. European society for trauma and emergency surgery member-identified research priorities in emergency surgery: a roadmap for future clinical research opportunities.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iain WilsonDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO3 6LY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5892-0307
Saqib RahmanDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO3 6LY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-0021
Philip PucherDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO3 6LY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2037-9930
Stuart MercerDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO3 6LY, UK. stuart.mercer@porthosp.nhs.uk.
Queen Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency general surgery patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are at reduced risk of mortality and may require reduced length of critical care stay. This study investigated the effect of laparoscopy on high-risk patients' post-operative care requirements.

methodsData were retrieved for all patients entered into the NELA database between 2013 and 2018. Only high-risk surgical patients (P-POSSUM predicted mortality risk of ≥ 5%) were included. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and open emergency general surgical procedures were compared using a propensity score weighting approach. Outcome measures included total length of critical care (level 3) stay, overall length of stay and inpatient mortality.

resultsA total of 66,517 high-risk patients received emergency major abdominal surgery. A laparoscopic procedure was attempted in 6998 (10.5%); of these, the procedure was competed laparoscopically in 3492 (49.9%) and converted to open in 3506 (50.1%). Following inverse probability treatment weighting adjustment for patient disease and treatment characteristics, high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a shorter median ICU stay (1 day vs 2 days p < 0.001), overall hospital length of stay (11 days vs 14 days p < 0.001) and a lower inpatient mortality (16.0% vs 18.8%, p < 0.001). They were also less likely to have a prolonged ICU stay with an OR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.83, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe results of this study suggest that in patients at high risk of post-operative mortality, laparoscopic emergency bowel surgery leads to a reduced length of critical care stay, overall length of stay and inpatient mortality compared to traditional laparotomy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyCritical CareHumansLaparotomyLength of StayOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCritical careEmergency general surgeryLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36692646
PMCPMC9872062
OpenAlexW4317831332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.