Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692617›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Performance with a new bone conduction implant audio processor in patients with single-sided deafness.

Wilhelm Wimmer, Michael Zbinden, Tom Gawliczek, Alexander Huber, Marco Caversaccio, Martin Kompis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Patient-reported outcomes and speech-in-noise performance with OSIA versus other transcranial devices in unilateral and asymmetric hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of the Auditory Performance in Noise of Bone-Anchored Hearing System in Patients With Single Side Sensorineural Deafness.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wilhelm WimmerDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. wilhelm.wimmer@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-2074
Michael ZbindenDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tom GawliczekDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander HuberDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marco CaversaccioDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin KompisDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

University of Bern Open access funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe SAMBA 2 BB audio processor for the BONEBRIDGE bone conduction implant features a new automatic listening environment detection to focus on target speech and to reduce interfering speech and background noises. The aim of this study was to evaluate the audiological benefit of the SAMBA 2 BB (AP2) and to compare it with its predecessor SAMBA BB (AP1).

methodsProspective within-subject comparison study. We compared the aided sound field hearing thresholds, speech understanding in quiet (Freiburg monosyllables), and speech understanding in noise (Oldenburg sentence test) with the AP1 and AP2. Each audio processor was worn for 2 weeks before assessment and seven users with single-sided sensorineural deafness (SSD) participated in the study. For speech understanding in noise, two complex noise scenarios with multiple noise sources including single talker interfering speech were used. The first scenario included speech presented from the front (S

resultsWe found improved speech understanding in quiet with the AP2 compared to the AP1 aided condition (on average + 17%, p = 0.007). In both noise scenarios, the AP2 lead to improved speech reception thresholds by 1.2 dB (S

conclusionClinicians can expect that patients with SSD will benefit from the SAMBA 2 BB by improved speech understanding in both quiet and in complex noise scenarios, when compared to the older SAMBA BB.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionBone ConductionHearingHumansProspective StudiesBONEBRIDGESAMBA 2 BBSpeech enhancementSpeech understanding in noiseUnilateral deafness

Identifiers

PMID36692617
PMCPMC10313841
OpenAlexW4317871184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.