ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2023
[Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-D) for shoulder disorders].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Work Ability in People with Musculoskeletal Disorders in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of Self-Reported Tools.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith a prevalence of up to 30%, shoulder disorders form the third largest group of musculoskeletal complaints worldwide. Their formation and development are influenced by psychosocial factors such as movement-related fear. One of the internationally most common measurements for quantifying fear of movement is the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).
objectivesTo investigate the reliability (internal consistency) and validity (structural validity, construct validity, predictive validity) of the FABQ‑D in a shoulder pain population. MATERIALS AND
methodsSubjects with shoulder pain were included in a multicenter cross-sectional study. In addition to fear-avoidance beliefs, pain intensity, subjective impairment in daily life and kinesiophobia were recorded. To this end, the FABQ‑D, numeric rating scale (NRS), Shoulder and Pain Disability Index (SPADI) and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-GV) were used.
resultsA total of 49 subjects (24 women and 25 men) with a mean age of 41.8 years (SD = 12.8) were included. The descriptive evaluation at item level showed good internal consistency of the FABQ‑D (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The homogeneity factor differs significantly between the subscales (Loevinger's H = 0.66-0.9). The correlation analyses did not show any clear convergence of the FABQ‑D with the TSK-GV (r = 0.3501; p = 0.0137). A divergence to the constructs of the NRS (r = 0.1818; p = 0.2112) and SPADI (r = 0.4415; p = 0.0015) were confirmed. The hypothesis testing resulted in 42.87% of the assumed hypotheses and therefore a low construct validity. The FABQ‑D and the TSK-GV showed a significant influence on the duration of the complaints (R
conclusionThe FABQ‑D is a reliable measurement tool. The construct validity should be further investigated in future studies. This study reproduced results from previous studies in other populations. The FABQ‑D appears to be an adequate measurement tool for quantifying fear of movement in patients with shoulder disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.