ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023
Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become a commonly utilized procedure for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. There is a paucity of data for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who undergo ERCP. The aim of this study is to examine the indications, complications, and inpatient outcomes of patients with IBD undergoing ERCP.
methodsFor this retrospective cohort study, we utilized the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2018-2019. We compared potential indications, outcomes, ERCP-related procedures, and resource utilization in patients who underwent ERCP and had a diagnosis of IBD to that of patients who underwent ERCP without a diagnosis of IBD. We utilized a multivariate regression model that accounted for several potential confounders.
resultsWe identified 318,590 ERCP procedures. Among them, 3625 ERCP procedures were performed in patients with an associated diagnosis of IBD. Patients with IBD who underwent ERCP had higher odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01-1.60) and sepsis (aOR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.07-1.67) compared to patients without IBD. However, inpatient mortality and other complications were not statistically different between the two groups. Patients with IBD were also less likely to undergo biliary sphincterotomy (aOR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62-0.88) but there were no other differences in performance of ERCP-related therapeutic interventions between the two groups. Adjusted costs and charges were not statistically different between the two groups.
conclusionOur study shows that ERCP is, overall, a safe procedure in patients with IBD, as inpatient morbidity and mortality are similar to patients without IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.