Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692532›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Biomarkers in osteoarthritis: current status and outlook - the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium PROGRESS OA study.

David J Hunter, Jamie E Collins, Leticia Deveza, Steven C Hoffmann, Virginia B Kraus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Deconstructing the "types" of osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David J HunterSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia. David.Hunter@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-752X
Jamie E CollinsBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Leticia DevezaSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Steven C HoffmannFoundation for the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, North, MD, USA.
Virginia B KrausDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, and Department of Medicine|, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, no disease-modifying therapies are approved for osteoarthritis (OA) use. One obstacle to trial success in this field has been our existing endpoints' limited validity and responsiveness. To overcome this impasse, the Foundation for the NIH OA Biomarkers Consortium is focused on investigating biomarkers for a prognostic context of use for subsequent qualification through regulatory agencies. This narrative review describes this activity and the work underway, focusing on the PROGRESS OA study.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisBiomarkersHumansPrognosisBiomarkersBiomarkersImagingOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36692532
PMCPMC10509067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.