Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692412›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

The effectiveness of Schroth method in Cobb angle, quality of life and trunk rotation angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luis Ceballos-Laita, Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren, Sara Cabanillas-Barea, Silvia Pérez-Guillén, Pilar Pardos-Aguilella, Sandra Jiménez Del Barrio

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07059663 (Synergic Effects of Schroth Method With and Without Core Stabilization Exercises in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07059663 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Synergic Effects of Schroth Method With and Without Core Stabilization Exercises in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsScoliosis, Scoliosis IdiopathicArmsSchroth Method with Core Stabilization Exercises, Schroth Method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luis Ceballos-LaitaClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.
Andoni Carrasco-UribarrenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Sara Cabanillas-BareaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain - scabanillas@uic.es.
Silvia Pérez-GuillénDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar Pardos-AguilellaDepartment of Physiatry and Nursery, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sandra Jiménez Del BarrioClinical Research in Health Sciences Group, Department of Surgery Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Physiotherapy, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Schroth method is one of the most common physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises intervention applied in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This method consists of three-dimensional correction of the specific curve pattern of the patient using a combination of sensorimotor, postural, and corrective breathing exercises. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse the effects of the Schroth method in isolation on Cobb angle, quality of life, and trunk rotation angle compared to no intervention or other conservative treatments in patients with AIS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of the Schroth method in isolation to conservative interventions or no intervention. The quality of the studies was assessed with the PEDro Scale, and the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Two independent assessors extracted data through a standardized form. Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity assessed with I EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 317 studies were screened. Six were included in the meta-analysis involving 144 patients with AIS. The methodological quality of the included studies ranged from high to low. Schroth method in isolation showed significant improvements in Cobb angle (mean difference [MD] =-3.18º; 95% CI: -4.30, -2.07; I

conclusionsThe Schroth method in isolation is effective for reducing the Cobb angle and the trunk rotation angle and for improving the QoL in the short-term compared to no intervention or other conservative therapies in AIS, but the improvement in Cobb angle did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference.

Indexed as

ScoliosisAdolescentExercise TherapyHumansOxygen IsotopesQuality of LifeOxygen-18Oxygen Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID36692412
PMCPMC10170402
OpenAlexW4317867051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.