Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692283›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

The Success of Cancer Crowdfunding Campaigns: Project and Text Analysis.

Xupin Zhang, Xinqi Tao, Bingxiang Ji, Renwu Wang, Silvia Sörensen

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Characteristics of Crowdfunding Campaigns for Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GoFundMe®: Crowdfunding Among Young Adult Patients With Cancer.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xupin ZhangDepartment of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-4861
Xinqi TaoDepartment of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-4311
Bingxiang JiDepartment of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-9496
Renwu WangDepartment of Information Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0980-0779
Silvia SörensenWarner School of Education and Human Development, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6102-1580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have analyzed the factors that contribute to variations in the success of crowdfunding campaigns for a specific cancer type; however, little is known about the influential factors among crowdfunding campaigns for multiple cancers.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between project features and the success of cancer crowdfunding campaigns and to determine whether text features affect campaign success for various cancers.

methodsUsing cancer-related crowdfunding projects on the GoFundMe website, we transformed textual descriptions from the campaigns into structured data using natural language processing techniques. Next, we used penalized logistic regression and correlation analyses to examine the influence of project and text features on fundraising project outcomes. Finally, we examined the influence of campaign description sentiment on crowdfunding success using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software.

resultsCampaigns were significantly more likely to be successful if they featured a lower target amount (Goal amount, β=-1.949, z score=-82.767, P<.001) for fundraising, a higher number of previous donations, agency (vs individual) organizers, project pages containing updates, and project pages containing comments from readers. The results revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between the length of the text and the amount of funds raised. In addition, more spelling mistakes negatively affected the funds raised (Number of spelling errors, β=-1.068, z score=-38.79, P<.001).

conclusionsDifficult-to-treat cancers and high-mortality cancers tend to trigger empathy from potential donors, which increases the funds raised. Gender differences were observed in the effects of emotional words in the text on the amount of funds raised. For cancers that typically occur in women, links between emotional words used and the amount of funds raised were weaker than for cancers typically occurring among men.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingFund RaisingNeoplasmsEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleSoftwarecampaign featurescancercrowdfundingemotional contentfundraisinggenderGoFundmesentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID36692283
PMCPMC10024214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read53
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.