Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36692138›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

NetProphet 3: a machine learning framework for transcription factor network mapping and multi-omics integration.

Dhoha Abid, Michael R Brent

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhoha AbidCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-7777
Michael R BrentCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8689-0299
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Mapping and modeling transcription factor networksR35GM141012 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRENT, MICHAEL R · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMany methods have been proposed for mapping the targets of transcription factors (TFs) from gene expression data. It is known that combining outputs from multiple methods can improve performance. To date, outputs have been combined by using either simplistic formulae, such as geometric mean, or carefully hand-tuned formulae that may not generalize well to new inputs. Finally, the evaluation of accuracy has been challenging due to the lack of genome-scale, ground-truth networks.

resultsWe developed NetProphet3, which combines scores from multiple analyses automatically, using a tree boosting algorithm trained on TF binding location data. We also developed three independent, genome-scale evaluation metrics. By these metrics, NetProphet3 is more accurate than other commonly used packages, including NetProphet 2.0, when gene expression data from direct TF perturbations are available. Furthermore, its integration mode can forge a consensus network from gene expression data and TF binding location data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data and code are available at https://zenodo.org/record/7504131#.Y7Wu3i-B2x8. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MultiomicsTranscription FactorsGene Expression RegulationMachine LearningProtein BindingTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID36692138
PMCPMC9912366
OpenAlexW4317866069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.