ArticleJCI insight2023
Delayed boosting improves human antigen-specific Ig and B cell responses to the RH5.1/AS01B malaria vaccine.
Article in JCI insight, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02927145 (A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of the Blood-stage Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate RH5.1/AS01), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of the Blood-stage Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria Vaccine Candidate RH5.1/AS01
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of new adjuvants in enhancing the immune response to a candidate of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus vaccine.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Malaria serology for surveillance, insights into immunity, and vaccine development.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- B and T cell responses to pre-erythrocytic R21/Matrix-M and blood-stage RH5.1/Matrix-M malaria vaccines in endemic settings.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Galaxy single-cell & spatial omics community update: Navigating new frontiers in 2025.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Costs, delivery strategies and implementation challenges for malaria vaccines: a rapid review of literature.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025Review
- Vaccine-induced responses to R21/Matrix-M - an analysis of samples from a phase 1b age de-escalation, dose-escalation trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Computational vaccine development against protozoa.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate RH5.1/Matrix-M in healthy Tanzanian adults and children; an open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human, single-centre, phase 1b trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2024Article
- A systems serology approach to identifying key antibody correlates of protection from cerebral malaria in Malawian children.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- The impact of Plasmodium-driven immunoregulatory networks on immunity to malaria.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024Review
- Article
- PvDBPII elicits multiple antibody-mediated mechanisms that reduce growth in a Plasmodium vivax challenge trial.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- Vaccination withScience translational medicine · 2023Article
- A Critical Review on Human Malaria and Schistosomiasis Vaccines: Current State, Recent Advancements, and Developments.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Analyses of human vaccine-specific circulating and bone marrow-resident B cell populations reveal benefit of delayed vaccine booster dosing with blood-stage malaria antigens.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Vaccine approaches for antigen capture by liposomes.Expert review of vaccinesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Modifications to vaccine delivery that increase serum antibody longevity are of great interest for maximizing efficacy. We have previously shown that a delayed fractional (DFx) dosing schedule (0-1-6 month) - using AS01B-adjuvanted RH5.1 malaria antigen - substantially improves serum IgG durability as compared with monthly dosing (0-1-2 month; NCT02927145). However, the underlying mechanism and whether there are wider immunological changes with DFx dosing were unclear. Here, PfRH5-specific Ig and B cell responses were analyzed in depth through standardized ELISAs, flow cytometry, systems serology, and single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq). Data indicate that DFx dosing increases the magnitude and durability of circulating PfRH5-specific B cells and serum IgG1. At the peak antibody magnitude, DFx dosing was distinguished by a systems serology feature set comprising increased FcRn binding, IgG avidity, and proportion of G2B and G2S2F IgG Fc glycans, alongside decreased IgG3, antibody-dependent complement deposition, and proportion of G1S1F IgG Fc glycan. Concomitantly, scRNA-Seq data show a higher CDR3 percentage of mutation from germline and decreased plasma cell gene expression in circulating PfRH5-specific B cells. Our data, therefore, reveal a profound impact of DFx dosing on the humoral response and suggest plausible mechanisms that could enhance antibody longevity, including improved FcRn binding by serum Ig and a potential shift in the underlying cellular response from circulating short-lived plasma cells to nonperipheral long-lived plasma cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.