Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691930›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.

Piotr Teodorowski, Sarah E Rodgers, Kate Fleming, Naheed Tahir, Saiqa Ahmed, Lucy Frith

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Involving Experts by Experience in Craniofacial Research.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piotr TeodorowskiDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2172-8298
Sarah E RodgersDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-0845
Kate FlemingNational Disease Registration Service, NHS Digital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6572-5016
Naheed TahirARC NWC Public Advisor, Liverpool, UK.
Saiqa AhmedARC NWC Public Advisor, Liverpool, UK.
Lucy FrithDepartment of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-0699

Funding

Department of Health 103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBig data research requires public support. It has been argued that this can be achieved by public involvement and engagement to ensure that public views are at the centre of research projects. Researchers should aim to include diverse communities, including seldom-heard voices, to ensure that a range of voices are heard and that research is meaningful to them.

objectiveWe explored how researchers involve and engage seldom-heard communities around big data research.

methodsThis is a qualitative study. Researchers who had experience of involving or engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research were recruited. They were based in England (n = 5), Scotland (n = 4), Belgium (n = 2) and Canada (n = 1). Twelve semistructured interviews were conducted on Zoom. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and we used reflexive thematic analysis to analyse participants' experiences.

resultsThe analysis highlighted the complexity of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities around big data research. Four themes were developed to represent participants' experiences: (1) abstraction and complexity of big data, (2) one size does not fit all, (3) working in partnership and (4) empowering the public contribution.

conclusionThe study offers researchers a better understanding of how to involve and engage seldom-heard communities in a meaningful way around big data research. There is no one right approach, with involvement and engagement activities required to be project-specific and dependent on the public contributors, researchers' needs, resources and time available. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Two public contributors are authors of the paper and they were involved in the study design, analysis and writing.

Indexed as

Big DataPatient ParticipationHumansQualitative ResearchResearch DesignResearch Personnelbig dataPPIpublic engagementpublic involvementqualitativeseldom-heard

Identifiers

PMID36691930
PMCPMC10010102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.