Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691678›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

An Effect of Gaze Direction in Cocktail Party Listening.

Virginia Best, Alex D Boyd, Kamal Sen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Virginia BestDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 1846Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-5736
Alex D BoydDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, 1846Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Kamal SenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, 1846Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY MASKINGR01DC004545 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2000 to 2021
$9.0M
Top-Down Control of Selective AmplificationR01DC013286 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BEST, VIRGINIA ANN, KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2014 to 2023
$6.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that gaze direction can influence auditory spatial perception, but the implications of this interaction for performance in complex listening tasks is unclear. In the current study, we investigated whether there is a measurable effect of gaze direction on speech intelligibility in a "cocktail party" listening situation. We presented sequences of digits from five loudspeakers positioned at 0°,  ±  15°, and ± 30° azimuth, and asked participants to repeat back the digits presented from a designated target loudspeaker. In different blocks of trials, the participant visually fixated on a cue presented at the target location or at a nontarget location. Eye position was tracked continuously to monitor compliance. Performance was best when fixation was on-target (vs. off-target) and the size of this effect depended on the specific configuration. This result demonstrates an influence of gaze direction in multitalker mixtures, even in the absence of visual speech information.

Indexed as

Sound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAuditory PerceptionHumansSpace Perceptioncrossmodal attentioneye trackingmultitalker speechsound localizationspatial attention

Identifiers

PMID36691678
PMCPMC9896088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.