ReviewiScience2023
Environmental and health risks of perovskite solar modules: Case for better test standards and risk mitigation solutions.
Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-informed machine learning for lead-free dual-absorber perovskites: unveiling the synergy of CsRSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Deciphering the Chemical Footprint of Renewables.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Just Transition Toward Clean Energy Access With Focus on Lead-Based Perovskite Solar Cell Technology: Lessons, Experiences, and Future Perspectives.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Review
- An integrated DFT + U and device simulation design of doped CsGeClScientific reports · 2026Article
- A review of lead leakage monitoring in perovskite solar cells: emerging detection technologies, just transition to clean energy and perspectives.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Lead-free halide perovskite memristors for scalable crossbar arrays.Nano convergence · 2025Review
- Editorial for This Special Issue on Energy Conversion Materials and Devices and Their Applications.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Exploring Nanoscale Perovskite Materials for Next-Generation Photodetectors: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions.Nano-micro letters · 2024Review
- All-perovskite tandem solar cells: from fundamentals to technological progress.Energy & environmental science · 2024Review
- Review
- Advances in Smart Photovoltaic Textiles.ACS nano · 2024Review
- Utilization of Personal Protective Equipment and Its Determinants Among Health Care Professionals in Public Hospitals in Resource-Limited Settings.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) promise high efficiencies and low manufacturing costs. Most formulations, however, contain lead, which raises health and environmental concerns. In this review, we use a risk assessment approach to identify and evaluate the technology risks to the environment and human health. We analyze the risks by following the technology from production to transportation to installation to disposal and examine existing environmental and safety regulations in each context. We review published data from leaching and air emissions testing and highlight gaps in current knowledge and a need for more standardization. Methods to avoid lead release through introduction of absorbing materials or use of alternative PSC formulations are reviewed. We conclude with the recommendation to develop recycling programs for PSCs and further standardized testing to understand risks related to leaching and fires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.