Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691569›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2023

CT-derived liver and spleen volume accurately diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Mario Romero-Cristóbal, Ana Clemente-Sánchez, Enrique Ramón, Luis Téllez, Elena Canales, Olga Ortega-Lobete, Elena Velilla-Aparicio, María-Vega Catalina, Luis Ibáñez-Samaniego, Sonia Alonso and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Novel advances following the integration of Baveno VII consensus definitions for the non-invasive testing of portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mario Romero-CristóbalLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Clemente-SánchezLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique RamónDepartment of Radiology, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Luis TéllezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Elena CanalesDepartment of Radiology, H. U. Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Olga Ortega-LobeteLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Elena Velilla-AparicioLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María-Vega CatalinaLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Ibáñez-SamaniegoLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia AlonsoLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Arturo ColónLiver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Ana-María MatillaLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Magdalena SalcedoLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín AlbillosCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael BañaresLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Diego RincónLiver Unit and Digestive Department, H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a landmark in the natural history of cirrhosis, influencing clinical decisions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous small series suggested that splanchnic volume measurements may predict portal hypertension. We aimed to evaluate whether volumetry obtained by standard multidetector computerised tomography (MDCT) can predict CSPH in patients with HCC. Methods: We included 175 patients with HCC, referred for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) evaluation, in whom contemporary MDCT was available. Liver volume, spleen volume (SV) and liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR: volume of the segments I-III/volume of the segments IV-VIII) were calculated semi-automatically from MDCT. Other non-invasive tests (NITs) were also employed. Results: Volume parameters could be measured in almost 100% of cases with an excellent inter-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.950). SV and LSVR were independently associated with CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg) and did not interact with aetiology. The volume Index (VI), calculated as the product of SV and LSVR, predicted CSPH (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89). Similar results were observed in an external cohort (n = 23) (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.00). Setting a sensitivity and specificity of 98%, VI could have avoided 35.9% of HVPG measurements. The accuracy of VI was similar to that of other NITs. VI also accurately predicted HVPG greater than 12, 14, 16 and 18 mmHg (AUC 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.88], 0.84 [95% CI 0.77-0.91], 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.92] and 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.94], respectively). Conclusions: Quantification of liver and spleen volumes by MDCT is a simple, accurate and reliable method of CSPH estimation in patients with compensated cirrhosis and HCC. Impact and implications: An increase in portal pressure strongly impacts outcomes after surgery in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Direct measurement through hepatic vein catheterization remains the reference standard for portal pressure assessment, but its invasiveness limits its application. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of CT scan-based liver and spleen volume measurements to predict portal hypertension in patients with HCC. Our results indicate that the newly described index, based on quantification of liver and spleen volume, accurately predicts portal hypertension. These results suggest that a single imaging test may be used to diagnose and stage HCC, while providing an accurate estimation of portal hypertension, thus helping to stratify surgical risks.

Indexed as

cirrhosiscross-sectional imagingCSPH, clinically significant portal hypertensionDAAs, direct-acting antivirals agentsHCC, hepatocellular carcinomahepatocellular carcinomaHVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradientLSPS, liver stiffness-spleen size-to-platelet ratio scoreLSVR, liver segmental volumeLV, liver volumeLV/SV, liver/spleen volume ratioMAFLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseaseMDCT, multidetector computerised tomographyNITs, non-invasive testsnon-invasive testorgan sizeportal hypertensionpredictive modelPSR, platelet count to spleen diameter ratioSV, spleen volumeTE, transient elastographyVI, volume index

Identifiers

PMID36691569
PMCPMC9860348
OpenAlexW4311106639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.