Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691531›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Revealing the sensory impact of different levels and combinations of esters and volatile thiols in Chardonnay wines.

Angelica Iobbi, Yanming Di, Elizabeth Tomasino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelica IobbiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Yanming DiDepartment of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Elizabeth TomasinoDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of different aroma families on tropical fruit aroma perception is still not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the effect of esters and volatile thiols on tropical fruit aroma perception in white wines. Four levels of thiols (none, low, medium and high) and three levels of esters (none, low, medium) were added to a dearomatized white wine base in a full factorial design. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) was used to determine the aroma descriptors that most differentiated the wines followed by Sensory Descriptive Analysis (SDA) to evaluate the intensity of those significant aroma attributes. More than 78% of the total variance was described in the first two dimensions when using Canonical Variate Analysis. Tropical fruit aromas were associated with wines containing different levels of esters and ester-thiol combinations. Volatile thiols alone imparted an earthy aroma and were grouped with the control wine. The different ester-thiol combinations altered the tropical fruit aroma quality in the wines from citrus to passionfruit, pineapple and guava. Understanding the cause of tropical fruit aroma allows for targeted processing to achieve the desired wine sensory quality.

Indexed as

Aroma interactionCheck-all-that-applyEstersSensory descriptive analysisTropical fruit aromaVolatile thiols

Identifiers

PMID36691531
PMCPMC9860267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.