ReviewHeliyon2023
Analysis of architectures implemented for IIoT.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-PLC: An I3oT Cross Platform to Manage Communications for Applications in Real Factories.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implementation and Experimental Application of Industrial IoT Architecture Using Automation and IoT Hardware/Software.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Dynamic IIoT Framework Based on the Publish-Subscribe Paradigm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Boosting precision crop protection towards agriculture 5.0Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several technological blocks are being developed to provide solutions to the requirements necessary for the implementation of industrial IoT. However, this is feasible with the resources offered by the Cloud, such as processing, applications and services. Despite this, there are negative aspects such as bandwidth, Internet service variability, latency, lack of filtering of junk data transmitted to the cloud and security. From another perspective, these situations emerge as challenges that are being studied to meet the needs of this new industrial era, which means that the important contribution of academia, companies and consortiums, are achieving a change of course, by taking advantage of the potential of the Cloud but now from the vicinity or perimeter of a production plant. To achieve this task, some pillars of IoT technology are being used as a basis, such as the designs of Fog Computing Platforms (FCP), Edge Computing (EC) and considering the need for cooperation between IT and operation technologies (IT and OT), with which it is intended to accelerate the paradigm shift that this situation has generated. The objective of this study is to show a systematic literature review (SLR) of recent studies on hierarchical and flat peer-to-peer (P2P) architectures implemented for manufacturing IIoT, analyzing those successes and weaknesses derived from them such as latency, security, computing methodologies, virtualization architectures, Fog Computing (FC) in Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), Quality of Service (QoS) and connectivity, with the aim of motivating possible research points when implementing IIoT with these new technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.