ArticleCase reports in urology2023
Response of Patients with Taxane-Refractory Advanced Urothelial Cancer to Enfortumab Vedotin, a Microtubule-Disrupting Agent.
Article in Case reports in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-in-Human, Phase I Study of Sigvotatug Vedotin, an Integrin Beta-6-Directed Antibody-Drug Conjugate: Results From Dose Expansion in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Insights into Efficacy and Safety of Enfortumab Vedotin in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Findings, Considerations, and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin-4-directed antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), has been approved for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune inhibitors. Taxane agents and MMAE share antitumor mechanisms through microtubule disruption, thus raising a notable concern regarding cross-resistance between these drugs. This case report describes two patients with taxane-based chemotherapy-refractory aUC who responded well to EV. A 71-year-old man (case 1) with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic UC showed a partial response to EV in metastatic lesions of the bilateral lungs and right pelvic lymph nodes after three cycles of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine chemotherapy. A 53-year-old man (case 2) with cT3bN2M0 bladder UC underwent platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the following radial cystectomy (ypTis ypN0). He developed bilateral lung metastases and showed a complete response to EV in the metastatic lesions after 20 cycles of paclitaxel plus nedaplatin chemotherapy. Our experience of two cases demonstrated that tumor response to EV can be expected in patients with taxane-refractory aUC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.