Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691235›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

How to increase value and reduce waste in research: initial experiences of applying Lean thinking and visual management in research leadership.

Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt, Kristian Kidholm, Jørgen Ejler Pedersen, Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad, Torben Knudsen, Aleksander Krag, Jesper Ryg, Oke Gerke, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Torkell Ellingsen and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Malene Grubbe HildebrandtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Malene.grubbe.hildebrandt@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-2720-9018
Kristian KidholmCentre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1037-6514
Jørgen Ejler PedersenDepartment of Quality and Patient Collaboration, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-3316
Mohammad Naghavi-BehzadDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-8126
Torben KnudsenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southwest Jutland Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-0115
Aleksander KragDepartment of Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-4932
Jesper RygDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-3062
Oke GerkeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6335-3303
Annmarie Touborg LassenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-6152
Torkell EllingsenDepartment of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0426-4962
Henrik J DitzelOncology Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3927-5135
Vibeke AndersenDepartment of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-2863
Annette LanghoffThe Research Committee, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Gert NielsenThe Research Committee, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Tahir MasudDepartment of Geriatric, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Anna-Marie Bloch MünsterDepartment of Managment, Southwest Jutland Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-3977
Kirsten KyvikInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-0245
Kim BrixenBoard of Direction, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6521-0904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste in research has been well documented, but initiatives to reduce it are scarce. Here, we share our initial experiences of implementing Lean thinking and visual management into hospital research units in the Region of Southern Denmark. A Transformation Guiding Team (TGT) anchored in the top management was established with participation from leaders, researchers and patient representatives. The role of the TGT was to implement Lean methods, considering patients as primary end-users of the research results. This is in line with an explicit decision on setting patient values first in clinical settings at participating hospitals. The leaders of the research units were instructed in Lean thinking and Lean methods during a five-module course focusing on increasing value and reducing waste in research production. Initial experiences were that Lean tools could create a patient-centred vision that through visual management could identify waste in work processes. Concerns were lack of evidence for using Lean methods in research leadership and that the model itself could be a time consumer. Some lessons learnt were that adding Lean tools in research leadership should not just provide increased research productivity, but also improve other important key performance indicators such as quality of research and patient-relevant results. We intend to evaluate the value of the initiative by follow-up research and publish the outcome of key behavioural and key performance indicators.

Indexed as

EfficiencyLeadershipEfficiency, OrganizationalHumanshealth policyhealth services administration & managementstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID36691235
PMCPMC9171225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.