Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691206›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

What are the solutions for well-being and burn-out for healthcare professionals? An umbrella realist review of learnings of individual-focused interventions for critical care.

Nurul Bahirah Binte Adnan, Hila Ariela Dafny, Claire Baldwin, Samantha Jakimowitz, Debra Chalmers, Ammar Moh'd Ahmad Aroury, Diane Chamberlain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for enhancing resilience in breast cancer patients: a realist review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Burnout, working alliance, and ward atmosphere: A multisite study of mental health professionals and patients with schizophrenia.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nurul Bahirah Binte AdnanCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Nurul.Adnan@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-2308
Hila Ariela DafnyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Claire BaldwinCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Samantha JakimowitzSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Debra ChalmersHawke's Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand.
Ammar Moh'd Ahmad ArouryCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Diane ChamberlainCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUHawke's Bay Hospital · NZUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine what, how, for whom and under what conditions individual-focused interventions are effective to improve well-being and decrease burn-out among critical care healthcare professionals.

designThis study is an umbrella review that used the realist approach, using Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards guidelines. PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN databases were searched for published and unpublished systematic reviews and meta-analyses literature between 2016 and 2020. The team appraised and extracted data and identified relationships between content, mechanism and outcomes (CMOs). Theory prepositions were developed using CMOs and were used to refine the existing programme.

resultsA total of 81 interventions from 17 reviews were mapped, including mindfulness interventions, cognitive-behavioural therapy, self-care and coping strategies. The revised programme theory determined that contextual factors such as ethnicity, workload, and work schedules play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of interventions. Mechanisms including the interventions' interests, acceptance, and receptivity are also influential in determining engagement and adherence to the intervention. Findings suggest that the solution for burn-out is complex. However, it offers an optimistic view of tailoring and customising one or a combination of interventions, integrating structured education and components of emotional intelligence. Self-care, social support, awareness or mindfulness and self-efficacy are prime components to improve emotional intelligence and resilience for critical care healthcare professionals to improve well-being and decrease burn-out experience.

conclusionsThese findings provide realistic and reliable reporting of outcomes to better support implementation within the 'real world'. Future research such as seeking validation using expert opinions can provide further in depth understanding of hidden contextual factors, mechanisms and their interactions to provide a greater depth of knowledge ready for application with the critical care population.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCognitive Behavioral TherapyDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansLearningINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREOrganisational developmentQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36691206
PMCPMC9462087
OpenAlexW4294957938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.