Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691158›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluating effects of the structural reform of outpatient psychotherapy for patients with mental disorders in Germany: comparing patients with and without comorbid chronic physical condition - rationale and study protocol of the ES-RiP project.

Hanna Kampling, Johannes Kruse, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Gereon Heuft, Andrea Christoffer, Thomas G Grobe, Ursula Marschall, Joachim Szecsenyi, Beate Wild, Mechthild Hartmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna KamplingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany hanna.kampling@psycho.med.uni-giessen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-0179
Johannes KruseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph FriederichDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gereon HeuftSection of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Clinic for Mental Health, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
Andrea ChristofferSection of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Clinic for Mental Health, University Hospital Munster, Munster, Germany.
Thomas G GrobeaQua - Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Gottingen, Germany.
Ursula MarschallDepartment of Medicine and Health Services Research, BARMER Institute for Health System Research, Wuppertal, Germany.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beate WildDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mechthild HartmannDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
ES-RiP-Consortium Study Group
Heidelberg University · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2017, in Germany, a structural reform of the outpatient psychotherapy guideline took place, aiming to reduce waiting times, to facilitate flexible low-threshold access (eg, general reachability by phone) and to lower access barriers for specific patient groups. The reform included new service elements, such as the implementation of additional psychotherapeutic consultations, acute short-term psychotherapeutic interventions and relapse prophylaxis as well as the promotion of group therapies, the facilitation of psychotherapists' availability, and the installation of appointment service centres. The ES-RiP project aims to thoroughly evaluate the effects of the reform with a special focus on patients with a comorbidity of mental disorders and chronic physical conditions (cMPs) compared with patients with a mental disorder but no long-term physical condition (MnoP). The project aims to evaluate (a) the extent to which the reform goals were achieved in the large group of patients with cMPs compared with MnoP, (b) the barriers that might hinder the implementation of the new guideline and (c) the procedures required for further developing and improving outpatient psychotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods design (quantitative, qualitative) along with a multilevel approach (patients, service providers, payers) triangulating several data sources (primary and secondary data) will be applied to evaluate the reform from different perspectives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the coordinating committee as well as one local ethics committee, Justus Liebig University Giessen and Marburg - Faculty of Medicine (approval number: AZ 107/20) and Heidelberg (approval number: S-466/2020). The results of this study will be disseminated through expert panels, conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00020344.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersOutpatientsComorbidityHumansPsychotherapymental healthorganisational developmentprimary careprotocols & guidelinesqualitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36691158
PMCPMC9442475
OpenAlexW4294266993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.