ArticleBMJ open2022
Coping in the role as next of kin of a person with a brain tumour: a qualitative metasynthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relatives' Involvement in the Care Pathway of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour: An Observational Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Group-based interventions for caregivers to patients diagnosed with a brain tumor: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- The communication of a high-grade glioma diagnosis- patients' reflections and perspectives based on a study-specific questionnaire.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Unspoken: Exploring Taboo Thoughts and Difficult Experiences Among Carers of People With Brain Cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- "I'm standing next to him, I'm supporting him"-Supporting a loved one with brain cancer to donate their brain: A qualitative study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- What do carers of people with high-grade glioma perceive could improve their preparedness to care, and what additional support do they require?Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBeing the next of kin of a person with a brain tumour is a stressful experience. For many, being a next of kin involves fear, insecurity and overwhelming responsibility. The purpose of this study was to identify and synthesise qualitative original studies that explore coping in the role as next of kin of a person with a brain tumour.
methodsA qualitative metasynthesis guided by Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines was used. The databases Medline, CHINAL and PsycINFO were searched for studies from January 2000 to 18 January 2022. Inclusion criteria were qualitative original studies that aimed to explore coping experience by the next of kin of a person with brain tumour. The next of kin had to be 18 years of age or older.
resultsOf a total of 1476 screened records data from 20 studies, including 342 participants (207 females, 81 males and 54 unclassified) were analysed into metasummaries and a metasynthesis. The metasynthesis revealed that the next of kin coping experiences were characterised by two main themes: (1) coping factors within the next of kin and as a support system, such as their personal characteristics, perceiving the role as meaningful, having a support system, and hope and religion; (2) coping strategies-control and proactivity, including regaining control, being proactive and acceptance.
conclusionNext of kin of patients with brain tumours used coping factors and coping strategies gathered within themselves and in their surroundings to handle the situation and their role. It is important that healthcare professionals suggest and facilitate these coping factors and strategies because this may reduce stress and make the role of next of kin more manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.